Nothing surprising here.
The fact that P2 and P3 labs are the main issues, especially since BatCoV studies were NOT done at P4, has been highlighted since the very beginning of the origins debate.
@garyruskin
Also the 81 P3 labs mentioned in the attached article is way off.
@sai_suryan @garyruskin
usrtk.org/biohazards/wuh… 
In Aug 2020 I published a list of 112 BSL-3 labs in China with @RdeMaistre.
Please use this better count:
researchgate.net/publication/34…
And the probabilistic paper it came with even gave a better official Chinese mention of 89 BSL-3 (inc. 34 ABSL-3) with 20 more under construction.
The same article also reported the 81 from Bai Chunli:
sohu.com/a/412594506_16… 
For the full analysis (Aug 20), see the probabilistic paper:
researchgate.net/publication/34… 
The same paper goes through a list of the various Wuhan P3 labs that are known to have been working a various degrees with BatCovs.
We clearly identified the WIV Zhengdian site with its P2s, P3s and P4s as somewhat less likely (we totally ignored the P4 anyway): 
@threadreaderapp compile