There was a time before the GGOs (Great Gag Orders) when Chinese scientists were publishing some very useful research
#1 on my list - 20th Feb 20:
'Analysis of the variation and evolution of SARS-CoV-2'
Points to a mean emergence date around 8th Nov 2019
Main conclusion 95% C.I. for emergence of SARS-CoV-2 is: [Sep 23, 2019 - Dec 15, 2019].
Average tMRCA time of 73 days, which gives an emergence around the 8th Nov 2019.
Research from BSL-3 Laboratory, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University Guangzhou
Also reported by Caixin, which did some good work too before the GGOs.
#2 on my list - published on a preprint site 21st Feb 2020, the day before the small WHO team was in Wuhan.
They point to a November emergence, dump the wet market story without much ceremony, complain about limited sequences, and try to figure out RaTG13
Somehow two of these scientists are from the Xishuangbanna Botanical Garden in Yunnan, which was on the 2012 WIV/EcoHealth sampling trip which intersected with the miners getting infected while shovelling bat guano not that far away
You can't make that up
Here it is: documentcloud.org/documents/7340…
Then there was the Confidential State Council gag order one week later on the 3rd March.
It also recommends organising publications with the propaganda dep, like a game of chess. documentcloud.org/documents/7340…
One does not mess up with the State Council - breaking its laws can be qualified as treason.
And for good measure it was followed by clear threat.
I look with nostalgia at this few days in February 2020, when at least two remarkable papers were published while the WHO team was in China.
Then the very day the WHO team left China that was the end of it.
It's quite amazing to imagine that the same CDC people who were interfacing with the WHO at the time must have been busy writing/reviewing that gag order.
They are clearly good at multi-tasking.
Anyway forget. It's time for more pangolin papers.