We are data-centred - not dogma-centred.
Sorry, the dogma letters or papers in Lancet / Nature are not for us.
This makes #DRASTIC revelations of the WIB DBs taken offline, first reported by the Washington Post based on our research (since published), all the more essential.
Argh, I must have sounded prophetic then:
But yes, you can either:
- sit your backside on some dogma and perorate in Lancet with no data in hand, or
- go and get the available (hidden) data, or crunch some code and do some experiments to create more data